Dazmaniac, on 05 Apr 2016 - 7:11 PM, said:
T,
Would you be doing all this griping about not having access to CF if you actually had access to it? You know, fighting the fight for those not so fortunate, or is it all about you and if you're alright jack, then the rest don't matter?
But if it was offered to you, no doubt you would turn it down as it would mean you were part of an elitist kiss the ring fraternity.
That's just the point. Apparently there is already some private criteria to get into this exclusive group; as evidenced by guys stating that they've had to fall before the developers and deliver materials that would somehow prove their worthiness to use the software.
We certainly cannot have users that aren't afraid to speak up about issues, having access to the crown jewels though, can we?
Which is why the guys that are already in the fold; either become as quiet as a church mouse... or turn into fanboy flame artists, when it comes time to discussing real issues.
No, I'm not willing to shill or troll for anyone, regardless of the software access I may or may not have.
Now, don't get me wrong. I do think that courses that get published for game use should have to meet minimum standards, for release approval. Nobody wants to have to sift through a bunch of broken courses. -- But, that doesn't mean there should be any reason why all interested users can't at least try to use the software, considering that it's working fine to make courses, right now.