Daz kind of hit it on point for me, in replying to the golden bear: just like in real life, I drive the old fashioned way: shifting the gears with the handshaker, so for me there is no "automatic gearbox". On the other hand, I never sought that option out -guess that explains why Hamilton laps me on any track in F12, F14, or F16...lol
But Mr. D does make the golden point of mentioning the gimmies are seen in match play, and that it does happen in the real golf world...bravo!!!
There is no need to do any upgrade: build on the fundamentals that are already in place.
There is no new audience to capture any new players from. The pc golf market out there today doesn't look promising to the 18-35 demo -which, unfortunately enough for the rest of us old pc golfing farts, is what keeps money flowing into any dev's coffers. The 18-35 demo pays the bills, we old-tymers don't.
To quote Mr. Bradley: "PG2 likely needs a fundamental shift in design ethos to build a player base, and for all our input of useful suggestions here, we're the fish already caught in the net. PG2 needs to trawl the open ocean for new ideas."
There is no need for new ideas. The base is already here in JNPG 1 -it simply needs some add ons.
Add all the new gimmicks you want in PG2, it still won't affect the overall attractiveness to new players -which is why I say improve on the current model, and maybe the TW08 and L2K3 golfers will come on board. The concept of attracting new players to pc golf won't change, regardless of the platform.
That draw doesn't come from new bells and whistles every two years, the draw comes from the youth in the world that actually take interest in the sport. The way it sits right now, there is no draw for the youth to the game of golf, as there are no role models to inspire anyone to golf (no matter what the Golf Channel tells you), let alone pc golf...
The 'demographic that counts' will not do any upgrade to their graphics card to play any pc golf game, be it PG1, let alone PG2. They will simply ignore said golf games and move on. That's why I said earlier for the devs to concentrate the resources to PG1, whatever limited resources are left at this point...
And no, I don't think that I am the only exception to not wanting or seeing a PG2. I'm just the sucker who alienates everyone by speaking up about it.
I am a realist, and reality tells me that offering PG2 will be nothing but a waste of time and money -on a small dev team that is very limited with both time and money to begin with -when they could be making money using the current PG1 model to earn money other than here, without having to appease to a small core of ex L2K3 and TW platform golfers, who for the most part imo seem to live on the champagne taste, but in reality: only with a beer pocket...
To answer the question: "how would you expect this game to go forward with out bringing it into the time's"?
Answer: there is no "times". The game cannot go into the "times" with the limited amount of people playing it today. Here, or on any pc golf platform out there today. TV ratings prove it. The demographic numbers don't lie.
The sad truth is, once this generation of TV golf watchers dies off, there won't be anyone to surplant what has left. Watch and see. The same applies to pc golf.
If there is only twenty "hardcore forum users", how many hardcore players are there here now? A hundred? Good, maybe. But not enough to keep the game alive -which is why you don't release a new model of anything, until the first one has been to it's limits. PG1 maxxed out to it's limits would imo nix any need for a PG2...
I have no chance of any retirement, but I certainly think I earned it. 50 years in the work force -ten of those self employed- should qualify me for retirement. But those ten years of self employment killed any chances of me drawing a decent salary. Besides that SS and medicare will be fiction by the time I turn 65...so I for one will have to work until the day I die.
It is exhilarating for those of the 'greatest generation' -and just before Generation X- to look down on me like I'm a no-good POS though, who think I should just go along with the status quo of the majority here...
Sorry to all of you, but I maintain the game should stay as-is, as PG1, improving on what PG1 already has now.
Done here today: I've said enough -probably too much...